A master’s thesis at the College of Law and Political Science discussing (the limits of the administration’s authority to impose and abolish disciplinary punishment/a comparative study)

A master’s thesis in public law at the College of Law and Political Science discussed the limits of the administration’s authority to impose and abolish disciplinary punishment/a comparative study.
The thesis submitted by the student: Rifqa Abdel Nasser Nehme aimed to achieve a balance between the effectiveness of the administration in the regular and steady functioning of the public facility on the one hand and the guarantees of the public employee on the other hand, and to achieve a balance between punishment and reward for the employee’s position, that is, holding everyone accountable who makes a mistake, punishing him, and rewarding whoever provides A distinctive delicacy or work.
The letter concluded that the French, Egyptian, and Iraqi Disciplinary Code did not mention disciplinary violations exclusively, meaning that it did not take into account the principle (no crime and no punishment except by a text) as is the case in the Penal Code. Rather, the legislation adopted the principle of “no punishment except by a text,” as the legislator specified the penalties that the disciplinary authorities may impose on the violating employee.
​